Sunday, October 7, 2007
Friday, October 5, 2007
Africans Don’t Adjust to Australian Way of Life’ – Aussie Minister
Australian immigration Minister Kevin Andrews has for the first time explicitly said that the Government squeezed the African component of the refugee program because "some groups don't seem to be settling and adjusting into the Australian way of life".
Andrews has previously skirted this issue, including stating in August that recent cuts in the African intake reflected "an improvement in conditions in some countries" in the region. But questioned yesterday about last week's fatal bashing in Noble Park of Sudanese refugee Liep Gony, 18, and whether better settlement services were needed, he said:
"I have been concerned that some groups don't seem to be settling and adjusting into the Australian way of life as quickly as we would hope and therefore it makes sense to put the extra money in to provide extra resources, but also to slow down the rate of intake from countries such as Sudan."
Federation of Ethnic Communities Councils of Australia advocate, Voula Messimeri, said all migrants experienced problems in settling and more intensive support was needed, despite a recent $200 million increase over four years announced in this year's budget.
Andrews confirmed Australia's 13,000 refugee allocation — which has been stable since at least the mid-1980s — included 30 per cent reserved for those from Africa. "Last financial year it was 50 per cent of the refugee and humanitarian program and the two previous years it was 70 per cent," he said.
Senior Constable James Waterson, a multicultural liaison officer with Victoria Police, who works closely with Sudanese and other minorities, said the vast majority of Sudanese who settled in Australia were not used to cars, email and other luxuries, "you get them congregating in public areas just as they do back there, which is how they've grown up for the last 15 to 20 years".
Andrews has previously skirted this issue, including stating in August that recent cuts in the African intake reflected "an improvement in conditions in some countries" in the region. But questioned yesterday about last week's fatal bashing in Noble Park of Sudanese refugee Liep Gony, 18, and whether better settlement services were needed, he said:
"I have been concerned that some groups don't seem to be settling and adjusting into the Australian way of life as quickly as we would hope and therefore it makes sense to put the extra money in to provide extra resources, but also to slow down the rate of intake from countries such as Sudan."
Federation of Ethnic Communities Councils of Australia advocate, Voula Messimeri, said all migrants experienced problems in settling and more intensive support was needed, despite a recent $200 million increase over four years announced in this year's budget.
Andrews confirmed Australia's 13,000 refugee allocation — which has been stable since at least the mid-1980s — included 30 per cent reserved for those from Africa. "Last financial year it was 50 per cent of the refugee and humanitarian program and the two previous years it was 70 per cent," he said.
Senior Constable James Waterson, a multicultural liaison officer with Victoria Police, who works closely with Sudanese and other minorities, said the vast majority of Sudanese who settled in Australia were not used to cars, email and other luxuries, "you get them congregating in public areas just as they do back there, which is how they've grown up for the last 15 to 20 years".
Holocaust Survivor: The Next Generation
'The New Batch' -- As the years have rolled on, the number of 'survivors' of the Holocaust have dwindled and the money spinner that has worked tirelessly for the past 60 years needs a re-vamp. So what's the deal we hear you say? Well as the numbers drop, they need a new 'gimmick,' and now it’s the children of Holocaust survivors who are taking over the family business of 'victim' by taking a Class Action against the German Government.
Israeli lawyer Gideon Fisher, himself a child of Holocaust survivors, has launched a class action against the German government to provide therapy for the children of Holocaust survivors who, he argues, are psychologically damaged by their parents' experiences in the camps.
There are more than a million people worldwide who are children of Holocaust survivors. Thousands of people have approached Fisher to take part in the class action. Many live in Israel but others live in various European countries, in North and South America, Australia and South Africa.
The lawsuit is not asking for financial compensation from the German government but is requesting that they pay therapists who can treat the damaged descendants of Holocaust survivors. "It is time to bring out the scream of the second generation who carry in their souls the scars and to acknowledge the fact that they too are Holocaust victims," says Fisher.
Specific problems identified in children include eating disorders, fear of dogs, persistent melancholy and self-imposed seclusion. One of the claimants was repeatedly chastised by her mother for looking Semitic and was told to keep on washing her hands and face in the hope of making her skin look lighter. Another is scared to get on a bus because it reminds her of the trains that her parents and other Jews were sent to concentration camps in.
Israeli lawyer Gideon Fisher, himself a child of Holocaust survivors, has launched a class action against the German government to provide therapy for the children of Holocaust survivors who, he argues, are psychologically damaged by their parents' experiences in the camps.
There are more than a million people worldwide who are children of Holocaust survivors. Thousands of people have approached Fisher to take part in the class action. Many live in Israel but others live in various European countries, in North and South America, Australia and South Africa.
The lawsuit is not asking for financial compensation from the German government but is requesting that they pay therapists who can treat the damaged descendants of Holocaust survivors. "It is time to bring out the scream of the second generation who carry in their souls the scars and to acknowledge the fact that they too are Holocaust victims," says Fisher.
Specific problems identified in children include eating disorders, fear of dogs, persistent melancholy and self-imposed seclusion. One of the claimants was repeatedly chastised by her mother for looking Semitic and was told to keep on washing her hands and face in the hope of making her skin look lighter. Another is scared to get on a bus because it reminds her of the trains that her parents and other Jews were sent to concentration camps in.
Video: First the "Jena 6," Now the "Norfolk 7" -- just another white victim
Watch this video where Negroes beat another White guy senseless. Hate crime? Nah, the victim is White, and we know that all we blue-eyed White devils deserve this punishment from "our former slaves."
Or, at least, that's what our anti-White government says, as our "leaders," once again, essentially ignore the growing anti-White vicious attacks ....
The vast majority of interracial attacks are non-White on White, yet the vast majority of "hate crimes" (as Big Brother euphemistically calls the added punishment for thoughts) are brought against Whites.
Why is this?
Why does our government discriminate against Whites in every facet of society--from preferential loans, housing, immigration, education, jobs, promotions, etc., ad nauseam?
More importantly, how long will we Whites continue to suffer these gross injustices perpetrated against our people by a tyrannical government who serves only plutocrats and non-Whites -- before we whites finally stand up and act like Whites?
Or, at least, that's what our anti-White government says, as our "leaders," once again, essentially ignore the growing anti-White vicious attacks ....
The vast majority of interracial attacks are non-White on White, yet the vast majority of "hate crimes" (as Big Brother euphemistically calls the added punishment for thoughts) are brought against Whites.
Why is this?
Why does our government discriminate against Whites in every facet of society--from preferential loans, housing, immigration, education, jobs, promotions, etc., ad nauseam?
More importantly, how long will we Whites continue to suffer these gross injustices perpetrated against our people by a tyrannical government who serves only plutocrats and non-Whites -- before we whites finally stand up and act like Whites?
Black Racism and “The Jena Six”
By John Perazzo - FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, September 27, 2007
Because they generally consider it bad manners to draw attention to obvious examples of black racism, the media -- in concert with contemporary America’s self-anointed champions of “civil rights” and “civil liberties” -- have recently put on a spectacular exhibition in the art of depicting black racism not as what it is, but rather as the unfortunate by-product of an allegedly underlying white racism.
At issue is the case of the so-called “Jena Six” -- the half-dozen black Louisiana youths who brutally beat an apparently loudmouthed white youth named Justin Barker last December. In the wake of that incident, the American Civil Liberties Union complained -- as did the political Left at large -- that the local district attorney was unjustified in having initially charged the defendants with attempted murder in this case of “questionable circumstances.”
Those circumstances were as follows: Last December 4 at Louisiana’s Jena High School, football player Mychal Bell led a gang of eight to ten fellow black students in pummeling Barker into unconsciousness in what the Jena Times called “one of the most violent attacks in Jena High School’s history.” Witnesses would later report that Barker’s attackers had “stomped him badly,” “stepped on his face” while he was “knocked out cold on the ground,” and “slammed his head on the concrete beam.” The media focused heavily on the notion that three white Jena students had provoked the attack by having hung nooses -- evoking images of lynchings -- from a tree (on campus) in whose vicinity blacks allegedly were unwelcome.
Quite apart from the question of whether a dumb (non-violent) prank by a bunch of teenage idiots is grounds for a violent assault, the fact is that Barker was not even involved in the prank.
Though the charges against Barker’s assailants were later reduced, the ACLU has solemnly stated that “the Jena Six case raises serious questions about a possible double standard for whites and blacks in the criminal justice system -- and in our schools.” Dennis Parker, Director of the ACLU’s Racial Justice Project, laments: “Possible differences in treatment between students of different races, the apparent overcharging of students by law enforcement and questions about the possibility of discrimination generally in the school are emblematic of the ‘school-to-prison pipeline’ cases that we are seeing nationwide.”
Members of the ACLU are schooled enough to know that many studies over the years have examined racial disparities in the criminal justice system, and that in the final analysis, when we compare black and white defendants who are charged with equivalent offenses and who have similar criminal records, we find that they are treated quite similarly by the justice system. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who led a massive protest in defense of the Jena Six a few days ago, might secretly understand this too, as might the NAACP, which expressed its solid “support” for the rally in honor of the black assailants. But unfortunately the hordes of protesters -- tens of thousands were bussed to Jena from all over the United States -- didn’t know any better.
Nor did they seem at all cognizant of the fact that there are mountains of evidence which entirely contradict their contention that black youngsters routinely get a raw deal from the juvenile justice system. To cite just one example: A mere five weeks before the Jena incident, a gang of perhaps 30 black teenagers brutally assaulted three white women -- 21-year-old Laura Schneider, 19-year-old Michelle Smith, and 19-year-old Loren Hyman -- in the Bixby Knolls section of Long Beach, California.
Hyman suffered 13 facial fractures that required extensive facial reconstruction surgery. Schneider suffered a concussion after one of the attackers yelled a racial slur at her, smashed a skateboard against her head, and continued beating her after she was already unconscious. In February 2007 the four main perpetrators, all of whom were aged 16 to 17 at the time of the attack, were each sentenced to serve a mere 60 days of house arrest -- which they were permitted to break in order to attend school and church -- and 250 hours of community service. The judge also ordered the lead attacker to attend an eight-week racial tolerance program at the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
Not much of a penalty for crimes that could easily have resulted in a death or two. And of course the ACLU, NAACP, Sharpton, and Jackson were nowhere to be seen or heard.
There is a larger issue at play, however, apart from whatever penalties the juvenile justice system metes out. That is the issue of black racism, a disturbingly widespread phenomenon in contemporary America. This phenomenon explains why tens of thousands of protesters willingly traveled long distances to stage a show of support for a pack of thugs who had indisputably perpetrated a brutally violent attack against a white person. It explains why they focused exclusively on defending the “rights” of those attackers, rather than on condemning the wrong they had done. And it explains why they chose to portray a group of raging predators as the innocent, misunderstood victims of modern America’s allegedly boundless bigotry.
Black racism also accounts for the fact that the vast majority of interracial violent crimes are of the black-on-white variety, and that statistically the “average” black is many times more likely to attack a white, than vice versa. While not all interracial crimes are motivated by racial animosities, many of them -- like a recently videotaped gang assault in Virginia -- certainly are.
But why should black racism be prevalent in America at this comparatively late stage in our nation’s evolution -- long after the rise of equal-opportunity mandates, affirmative action policies, civil rights advances, and the stigmatization of racism to the point where “racist” is by far the epithet most feared by whites, be they political figures, business leaders, clergy, academics, or social commentators?
It’s actually quite simple. Black racism remains a dynamic phenomenon because African Americans have been told, ad nauseum, by “civil rights leaders” and by leftist whites in influential organizations like the ACLU, to look outside of themselves for the roots of every ill that plagues their community; to reflexively blame white society for their problems rather than to take responsibility for their own lives; and to view themselves as the oppressed and powerless victims of a white “power structure,” a status they are led to believe renders them somehow incapable of being genuine racists themselves -- no matter how much they may detest the white people they perceive to be their tormenters. Moreover, they have been taught to angrily reject astute observations like those of Bill Cosby, who has publicly lamented how illegitimacy, parental neglect, lack of educational effort, and bad behavior have decimated black life.
Only the victim mentality fostered by the “civil rights” champions of our day could have prompted tens of thousands of people to think that rallying on behalf of the Jena Six was a worthwhile use of their time. Having listened for so long to the “civil rights” establishment’s incessant depictions of the United States as a land of racial inequity, many black Americans have become angry, embittered racists themselves. They are among the legions who, in the words of black columnist Michael Meyers, zealously “transform themselves into the apostles of their own delusions.”
Because they generally consider it bad manners to draw attention to obvious examples of black racism, the media -- in concert with contemporary America’s self-anointed champions of “civil rights” and “civil liberties” -- have recently put on a spectacular exhibition in the art of depicting black racism not as what it is, but rather as the unfortunate by-product of an allegedly underlying white racism.
At issue is the case of the so-called “Jena Six” -- the half-dozen black Louisiana youths who brutally beat an apparently loudmouthed white youth named Justin Barker last December. In the wake of that incident, the American Civil Liberties Union complained -- as did the political Left at large -- that the local district attorney was unjustified in having initially charged the defendants with attempted murder in this case of “questionable circumstances.”
Those circumstances were as follows: Last December 4 at Louisiana’s Jena High School, football player Mychal Bell led a gang of eight to ten fellow black students in pummeling Barker into unconsciousness in what the Jena Times called “one of the most violent attacks in Jena High School’s history.” Witnesses would later report that Barker’s attackers had “stomped him badly,” “stepped on his face” while he was “knocked out cold on the ground,” and “slammed his head on the concrete beam.” The media focused heavily on the notion that three white Jena students had provoked the attack by having hung nooses -- evoking images of lynchings -- from a tree (on campus) in whose vicinity blacks allegedly were unwelcome.
Quite apart from the question of whether a dumb (non-violent) prank by a bunch of teenage idiots is grounds for a violent assault, the fact is that Barker was not even involved in the prank.
Though the charges against Barker’s assailants were later reduced, the ACLU has solemnly stated that “the Jena Six case raises serious questions about a possible double standard for whites and blacks in the criminal justice system -- and in our schools.” Dennis Parker, Director of the ACLU’s Racial Justice Project, laments: “Possible differences in treatment between students of different races, the apparent overcharging of students by law enforcement and questions about the possibility of discrimination generally in the school are emblematic of the ‘school-to-prison pipeline’ cases that we are seeing nationwide.”
Members of the ACLU are schooled enough to know that many studies over the years have examined racial disparities in the criminal justice system, and that in the final analysis, when we compare black and white defendants who are charged with equivalent offenses and who have similar criminal records, we find that they are treated quite similarly by the justice system. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who led a massive protest in defense of the Jena Six a few days ago, might secretly understand this too, as might the NAACP, which expressed its solid “support” for the rally in honor of the black assailants. But unfortunately the hordes of protesters -- tens of thousands were bussed to Jena from all over the United States -- didn’t know any better.
Nor did they seem at all cognizant of the fact that there are mountains of evidence which entirely contradict their contention that black youngsters routinely get a raw deal from the juvenile justice system. To cite just one example: A mere five weeks before the Jena incident, a gang of perhaps 30 black teenagers brutally assaulted three white women -- 21-year-old Laura Schneider, 19-year-old Michelle Smith, and 19-year-old Loren Hyman -- in the Bixby Knolls section of Long Beach, California.
Hyman suffered 13 facial fractures that required extensive facial reconstruction surgery. Schneider suffered a concussion after one of the attackers yelled a racial slur at her, smashed a skateboard against her head, and continued beating her after she was already unconscious. In February 2007 the four main perpetrators, all of whom were aged 16 to 17 at the time of the attack, were each sentenced to serve a mere 60 days of house arrest -- which they were permitted to break in order to attend school and church -- and 250 hours of community service. The judge also ordered the lead attacker to attend an eight-week racial tolerance program at the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
Not much of a penalty for crimes that could easily have resulted in a death or two. And of course the ACLU, NAACP, Sharpton, and Jackson were nowhere to be seen or heard.
There is a larger issue at play, however, apart from whatever penalties the juvenile justice system metes out. That is the issue of black racism, a disturbingly widespread phenomenon in contemporary America. This phenomenon explains why tens of thousands of protesters willingly traveled long distances to stage a show of support for a pack of thugs who had indisputably perpetrated a brutally violent attack against a white person. It explains why they focused exclusively on defending the “rights” of those attackers, rather than on condemning the wrong they had done. And it explains why they chose to portray a group of raging predators as the innocent, misunderstood victims of modern America’s allegedly boundless bigotry.
Black racism also accounts for the fact that the vast majority of interracial violent crimes are of the black-on-white variety, and that statistically the “average” black is many times more likely to attack a white, than vice versa. While not all interracial crimes are motivated by racial animosities, many of them -- like a recently videotaped gang assault in Virginia -- certainly are.
But why should black racism be prevalent in America at this comparatively late stage in our nation’s evolution -- long after the rise of equal-opportunity mandates, affirmative action policies, civil rights advances, and the stigmatization of racism to the point where “racist” is by far the epithet most feared by whites, be they political figures, business leaders, clergy, academics, or social commentators?
It’s actually quite simple. Black racism remains a dynamic phenomenon because African Americans have been told, ad nauseum, by “civil rights leaders” and by leftist whites in influential organizations like the ACLU, to look outside of themselves for the roots of every ill that plagues their community; to reflexively blame white society for their problems rather than to take responsibility for their own lives; and to view themselves as the oppressed and powerless victims of a white “power structure,” a status they are led to believe renders them somehow incapable of being genuine racists themselves -- no matter how much they may detest the white people they perceive to be their tormenters. Moreover, they have been taught to angrily reject astute observations like those of Bill Cosby, who has publicly lamented how illegitimacy, parental neglect, lack of educational effort, and bad behavior have decimated black life.
Only the victim mentality fostered by the “civil rights” champions of our day could have prompted tens of thousands of people to think that rallying on behalf of the Jena Six was a worthwhile use of their time. Having listened for so long to the “civil rights” establishment’s incessant depictions of the United States as a land of racial inequity, many black Americans have become angry, embittered racists themselves. They are among the legions who, in the words of black columnist Michael Meyers, zealously “transform themselves into the apostles of their own delusions.”
Jews Ban Ron Paul From Debate
Citing that they "disagree with Ron Paul on issues of foreign policy", the Republican Jewish Coalition Candidates Forum has excluded Ron Paul from their debate in Washington, DC on October 16. This according to Jim Perry, President of "Jews for Ron Paul". Of course the greater majority of Jews are opposed to Ron Paul receiving any attention from the public thus the Jewish media has not reported on many of his successful showings in Straw polls across the nation.
And why does the RJC disagree with Ron Paul on issues of foreign policy? Ron Paul simply stands for American interests in the formation of foreign policy in the Middle East and elsewhere and speaks the truth regarding the root cause of terrorism, the U.S. support of Israel and the hatred among the Muslim people which that support has brought toward America. Ron Paul is vocal in his belief that fighting wars in the Middle East will not do anything to stop terrorism and that a new foreign policy in the Middle East, one that is not nearly as pro-Israel as it is today, will be the only way to defeat terrorism.
Ron Paul can be classified as a patriot. What can be said about the candidates that have been invited to participate? Certainly the Jewish group holding this debate do not see any change in America's pro-Israel policy should Sam Brownback, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, John McCain, Fred Thompson, or Mike Huckabee be elected president, as these candidates who were invited must not disagree with the RJC's pro-Zionist views regarding America's support of Israel or they would have been excluded, as Ron Paul was. Some, including us here at natallnews, would consider the candidates pandering to these pro-Israel Jews as traitors.
And why does the RJC disagree with Ron Paul on issues of foreign policy? Ron Paul simply stands for American interests in the formation of foreign policy in the Middle East and elsewhere and speaks the truth regarding the root cause of terrorism, the U.S. support of Israel and the hatred among the Muslim people which that support has brought toward America. Ron Paul is vocal in his belief that fighting wars in the Middle East will not do anything to stop terrorism and that a new foreign policy in the Middle East, one that is not nearly as pro-Israel as it is today, will be the only way to defeat terrorism.
Ron Paul can be classified as a patriot. What can be said about the candidates that have been invited to participate? Certainly the Jewish group holding this debate do not see any change in America's pro-Israel policy should Sam Brownback, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, John McCain, Fred Thompson, or Mike Huckabee be elected president, as these candidates who were invited must not disagree with the RJC's pro-Zionist views regarding America's support of Israel or they would have been excluded, as Ron Paul was. Some, including us here at natallnews, would consider the candidates pandering to these pro-Israel Jews as traitors.
White Woman Targeted by African-“Americans”
Young Whites fed up with the Jena 6 hype decided to video an unscripted satire during a drinking party. A freshman at the University of Louisiana at Monroe placed the video on her Facebook page.
She was then targeted by a Washington Post blogger, people told the freshman she was going to get shot and then a meeting was called at the university, which was attended mostly by “athletes” (aka Africans) and run by the African-“American” Vice-President of Student Affairs.
Although she placed it on Facebook, a private web system which groups students based on colleges and universities and none of the events were associated with the university, one fears the caucasiopaths at the university might find some way to go after her.
The university plans to conduct more “diversity” activities, but one suspects it won’t push a policy of its OK to agree to disagree.
Jena Six-related video puts spotlight on ULM
MONROE -- Tears pouring down her cheeks, Kristy Smith sobbed in broad daylight this afternoon.
The dangerous combination of video cameras and the World Wide Web has brought Smith’s world crashing down upon her.
“This is so not me,” the frightened nursing freshman cried in front of Starbucks on the University of Louisiana at Monroe campus. “It wasn’t that we were making fun of the Jena Six incident. We were just fed up with it.”
An online video Smith recently recorded and placed on her social networking Facebook page has circulated around the Web fast. Smith admitted it was a re-enactment of the December fight in which six black Jena High School students left white student Justin Barker unconscious.
She was then targeted by a Washington Post blogger, people told the freshman she was going to get shot and then a meeting was called at the university, which was attended mostly by “athletes” (aka Africans) and run by the African-“American” Vice-President of Student Affairs.
Although she placed it on Facebook, a private web system which groups students based on colleges and universities and none of the events were associated with the university, one fears the caucasiopaths at the university might find some way to go after her.
The university plans to conduct more “diversity” activities, but one suspects it won’t push a policy of its OK to agree to disagree.
Jena Six-related video puts spotlight on ULM
MONROE -- Tears pouring down her cheeks, Kristy Smith sobbed in broad daylight this afternoon.
The dangerous combination of video cameras and the World Wide Web has brought Smith’s world crashing down upon her.
“This is so not me,” the frightened nursing freshman cried in front of Starbucks on the University of Louisiana at Monroe campus. “It wasn’t that we were making fun of the Jena Six incident. We were just fed up with it.”
An online video Smith recently recorded and placed on her social networking Facebook page has circulated around the Web fast. Smith admitted it was a re-enactment of the December fight in which six black Jena High School students left white student Justin Barker unconscious.
What US Vets Get In Return For Fighting The War For Israel, Huge Medical Bills
Many of the 185,000 U.S. soldiers who have sought care at the VA due to being injured in the war for Israel in Iraq have found that disability payments don't cover many of their costs for medical care. Veterans of the war have had trouble keeping jobs, paying their bills and some may even lose their houses. Soldiers have little faith in the government to give them the quality medical care that their heroic service deserves, and who can blame them?
Jewish money-changers and raceless capitalists in the credit card and housing markets cast a cloud of despair over these veterans with bills that the little federal help they receive don't begin to help cover. Many of these veterans were very accomplished individuals before their service in the Zionist war in Iraq robbed them of any way to make a livelyhood for themselves due to their injuries. Because of faulty planning by the government, the more than 700,000 soldiers that are now predicted to eventually seek care will be subject to this poor treatment.
Veteran John Waltz blames his post-traumatic stress disorder on his rescue work at a plane crash aboard a carrier bound for an Iraqi tour. While disability claims were evaluated by the government, he ran up $12,000 worth of medical bills which is a burden on his family's $30,000 yearly income that was cut in half because of his inability to work. America's bravest who are injured in battle are forced to penny-pinch all because America's politicians refuse to stand up to the powerful Jewish individuals and groups that pushed for the war in Iraq. These soldiers, who shouldn't have even been put onto the battlefield, must now struggle to get by back at home while many of them will have to live with disabilities that will last a lifetime.
Jewish money-changers and raceless capitalists in the credit card and housing markets cast a cloud of despair over these veterans with bills that the little federal help they receive don't begin to help cover. Many of these veterans were very accomplished individuals before their service in the Zionist war in Iraq robbed them of any way to make a livelyhood for themselves due to their injuries. Because of faulty planning by the government, the more than 700,000 soldiers that are now predicted to eventually seek care will be subject to this poor treatment.
Veteran John Waltz blames his post-traumatic stress disorder on his rescue work at a plane crash aboard a carrier bound for an Iraqi tour. While disability claims were evaluated by the government, he ran up $12,000 worth of medical bills which is a burden on his family's $30,000 yearly income that was cut in half because of his inability to work. America's bravest who are injured in battle are forced to penny-pinch all because America's politicians refuse to stand up to the powerful Jewish individuals and groups that pushed for the war in Iraq. These soldiers, who shouldn't have even been put onto the battlefield, must now struggle to get by back at home while many of them will have to live with disabilities that will last a lifetime.
Zimbabwe Runs Out of Bread
Zimbabwe's bakeries have shut and supermarkets have warned there will be no bread for the foreseeable future as the government admitted that wheat production had collapsed following the seizure of white-owned farms.
The agricultural ministry announcement that the wheat harvest is only about a third of what is required, and that imports are held up by lack of hard currency, came as a deadline passed today for the last white farmers to leave their land or face prosecution for trespass.
The maize harvest is expected to be equally dire and price controls to contain hyperinflation have emptied the stores of most other foodstuffs. The World Food Programme says at least 3 million people - one in four of the population - will need food aid in the coming months. It describes hunger in some parts of the country, which used to be a food exporter, as "acutely serious".
Last week, the government said it plans to import 100,000 tonnes of wheat but acknowledged that a shipment of 35,000 tonnes was held up in Mozambique because of a shortage of hard currency to pay for it.
The agriculture minister, Rugare Gumbo, has blamed the food shortages on black farmers who have taken over formerly white-owned land.
"I am painfully aware of the widespread theft of stock, farm produce, irrigation equipment and the general vandalism of infrastructure by our new farmers," he said.
"I am disappointed that our new farmers have proved to be failures since the start of the land reform programme in 2000. In spite of all the support government has been pouring into the agricultural sector, productivity and under-utilisation of land remain issues of concern."
The ministry of agriculture has also blamed electricity shortages for the wheat shortfall, saying that power cuts have affected irrigation and halved crop yields per acre.
The agricultural ministry announcement that the wheat harvest is only about a third of what is required, and that imports are held up by lack of hard currency, came as a deadline passed today for the last white farmers to leave their land or face prosecution for trespass.
The maize harvest is expected to be equally dire and price controls to contain hyperinflation have emptied the stores of most other foodstuffs. The World Food Programme says at least 3 million people - one in four of the population - will need food aid in the coming months. It describes hunger in some parts of the country, which used to be a food exporter, as "acutely serious".
Last week, the government said it plans to import 100,000 tonnes of wheat but acknowledged that a shipment of 35,000 tonnes was held up in Mozambique because of a shortage of hard currency to pay for it.
The agriculture minister, Rugare Gumbo, has blamed the food shortages on black farmers who have taken over formerly white-owned land.
"I am painfully aware of the widespread theft of stock, farm produce, irrigation equipment and the general vandalism of infrastructure by our new farmers," he said.
"I am disappointed that our new farmers have proved to be failures since the start of the land reform programme in 2000. In spite of all the support government has been pouring into the agricultural sector, productivity and under-utilisation of land remain issues of concern."
The ministry of agriculture has also blamed electricity shortages for the wheat shortfall, saying that power cuts have affected irrigation and halved crop yields per acre.
Race proven by Science; France Adopts DNA Tests for Invaders
France's Senate has approved a controversial law allowing voluntary DNA tests for would-be immigrants seeking to join family in France.
Supporters of the move - part of a tough immigration bill passed by the lower house - say it will speed up the process for genuine applicants. They argue that 12 other European countries have similar rules.
Critics have attacked the law as racist and question the use of genetics as a basis for citizenship. The legislation asks immigrant family members older than 16 to take a test in their country of origin, demonstrating a good knowledge of French language and values.
Applicants also have to prove that their family in France could support them and earn at least the minimum wage. Immigration Minister Brice Hortefeux made some last-minute changes to the bill before the Senate vote. The tests will now be paid for by the French government, to prevent any possible discrimination against those who cannot afford the tests. In addition, they will now only examine maternal DNA, to prevent paternity disputes arising from the tests.
Supporters of the move - part of a tough immigration bill passed by the lower house - say it will speed up the process for genuine applicants. They argue that 12 other European countries have similar rules.
Critics have attacked the law as racist and question the use of genetics as a basis for citizenship. The legislation asks immigrant family members older than 16 to take a test in their country of origin, demonstrating a good knowledge of French language and values.
Applicants also have to prove that their family in France could support them and earn at least the minimum wage. Immigration Minister Brice Hortefeux made some last-minute changes to the bill before the Senate vote. The tests will now be paid for by the French government, to prevent any possible discrimination against those who cannot afford the tests. In addition, they will now only examine maternal DNA, to prevent paternity disputes arising from the tests.
Stone Age Tribe Discovered in Amazon
A previously unknown indigenous group living in isolation has been found deep in Peru's Amazon jungle, a team of ecologists has said. The ecologists spotted the 21 Indians near the Brazilian border as they flew overhead looking for illegal loggers.
Contact with outsiders can be fatal for isolated tribes people who have no immunity to many diseases. Some groups have fled deep into the jungle to avoid contact with loggers and oil and gas prospectors.
The group was photographed and filmed from the air on the banks of the Las Piedras River in Peru's south-eastern Amazon region. A government official who was on the flight said there were three palm huts on the river bank.
"We've found five other sites with this kind of shelter along the same river," Ricardo Hon told Associated Press news agency. "This group is nomadic."
He said the government had no plans to try to find the tribe again. The steady advance of logging has forced the isolated groups, among them the Mashco-Piro and Yora tribes, deeper into Peru's jungle frontier with Brazil and Bolivia.
Indigenous leaders say tribes have suffered many deaths from diseases contracted from outsiders.
Contact with outsiders can be fatal for isolated tribes people who have no immunity to many diseases. Some groups have fled deep into the jungle to avoid contact with loggers and oil and gas prospectors.
The group was photographed and filmed from the air on the banks of the Las Piedras River in Peru's south-eastern Amazon region. A government official who was on the flight said there were three palm huts on the river bank.
"We've found five other sites with this kind of shelter along the same river," Ricardo Hon told Associated Press news agency. "This group is nomadic."
He said the government had no plans to try to find the tribe again. The steady advance of logging has forced the isolated groups, among them the Mashco-Piro and Yora tribes, deeper into Peru's jungle frontier with Brazil and Bolivia.
Indigenous leaders say tribes have suffered many deaths from diseases contracted from outsiders.
Le Pen Helps Launch Bulgarian Nationalist Campaign
The leader of the French Front National, Jean-Marie Le Pen, helped launched the election campaign in Sofia for the Bulgarian nationalist party, "Ataka".
Le Pen, a member of the European parliament (MEP), told a press conference: "We will fight arm in arm against those people who are united in weakening Europe and seek its submission."
His personal appearance in the Bulgarian capital comes ahead of local elections taking place October 28. "We think that each and every nation, and Europe in general, is threatened by the menace of globalization, and the nation state -- dubbed an enemy by our opponents -- is in fact the greatest guarantee of our identity, liberty, security and the culture of our people," he declared.
"Ataka", led by Volen Siderov, made its electoral breakthrough into the Bulgarian parliament in 2005, and has three MEPs.
Le Pen, a member of the European parliament (MEP), told a press conference: "We will fight arm in arm against those people who are united in weakening Europe and seek its submission."
His personal appearance in the Bulgarian capital comes ahead of local elections taking place October 28. "We think that each and every nation, and Europe in general, is threatened by the menace of globalization, and the nation state -- dubbed an enemy by our opponents -- is in fact the greatest guarantee of our identity, liberty, security and the culture of our people," he declared.
"Ataka", led by Volen Siderov, made its electoral breakthrough into the Bulgarian parliament in 2005, and has three MEPs.
David Irving Backtracks on Holocaust, Accepts ‘Mass Extermination’ Myth
According to an article in the extremist leftist Guardian newspaper in Britain, historian David Irving has backtracked on his earlier views about the Holocaust myth and now accepts that the Nazis engaged in mass extermination of Jews in certain camps.
Irving says that his views on the Holocaust have crystallized rather than changed. He says that he believes the Jews were responsible for what happened to them during the Second World War and that the "Jewish problem" was responsible for nearly all the wars of the past 100 years: "The Jews are the architects of their own misfortune, but that is the short version A-Z. Between A-Z there are then 24 other characters in intervening steps."
He says that a document, which he is 80% sure is genuine, suggests that 2.4 million Jews were killed in Poland, but goes on to claim that the gas chamber at Auschwitz was fake. "It was not the centre of the killing operations - it has only become a focus because it is the site that is best preserved. Much of what is shown the tourists there is faked postwar - watchtowers, even the famous gas chamber."
He added: "In my opinion now the real killing operations took place at the Reinhardt camps west of the Bug river. In the three camps here [Sobibor, Belzec, and Treblinka] Heinrich Himmler's men (mostly Ukrainian mercenaries) killed possibly as many as 2.4 million in the two years up to October 1943. There is now nothing to be seen of the Reinhardt camps, neither stick nor stone, so few tourists go there. I have visited all four sites earlier this year."
Pressed as to whether this change undermined his previous stance, Irving replied: "It is a crystallization of my view." Asked if he now accepts there had been a Holocaust against the Jewish people he said he was "not going to use their trade name".
He added: "I do accept that the Nazis quite definitely, that Heinrich Himmler, organized and directed a program, a clandestine program, for the liquidation of European Jews ... and that in 1942-43 alone over 2.5 million Jews were killed in those three camps." He added that Hitler was "completely in the dark" about the program.
Irving says that his views on the Holocaust have crystallized rather than changed. He says that he believes the Jews were responsible for what happened to them during the Second World War and that the "Jewish problem" was responsible for nearly all the wars of the past 100 years: "The Jews are the architects of their own misfortune, but that is the short version A-Z. Between A-Z there are then 24 other characters in intervening steps."
He says that a document, which he is 80% sure is genuine, suggests that 2.4 million Jews were killed in Poland, but goes on to claim that the gas chamber at Auschwitz was fake. "It was not the centre of the killing operations - it has only become a focus because it is the site that is best preserved. Much of what is shown the tourists there is faked postwar - watchtowers, even the famous gas chamber."
He added: "In my opinion now the real killing operations took place at the Reinhardt camps west of the Bug river. In the three camps here [Sobibor, Belzec, and Treblinka] Heinrich Himmler's men (mostly Ukrainian mercenaries) killed possibly as many as 2.4 million in the two years up to October 1943. There is now nothing to be seen of the Reinhardt camps, neither stick nor stone, so few tourists go there. I have visited all four sites earlier this year."
Pressed as to whether this change undermined his previous stance, Irving replied: "It is a crystallization of my view." Asked if he now accepts there had been a Holocaust against the Jewish people he said he was "not going to use their trade name".
He added: "I do accept that the Nazis quite definitely, that Heinrich Himmler, organized and directed a program, a clandestine program, for the liquidation of European Jews ... and that in 1942-43 alone over 2.5 million Jews were killed in those three camps." He added that Hitler was "completely in the dark" about the program.
Pay Up Whitey, You Have Jews to Protect
Jewish institutions will receive the majority of U.S. federal funds -- your tax money -- designated this year to help secure non-profit organizations. Of the 308 grants awarded through the Urban Areas Security Initiative Non-Profit Security Grant Program, 251 are being allocated to Jewish groups, totaling $19.6 million.
The $24 million in total grants announced by the Department of Homeland Security last week vary in amounts, with $100,000 the maximum. The funds are used to provide everything from roadblocks to security cameras to blast-proof doors and windows at locations that could be terrorist targets.
The grants were announced a few days after representatives of the Department of Homeland Security’s Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives toured the Jewish community's national security alert organization in Manhattan.
Center director John Kim Cook said: "Our objective is to get right in the middle of [Department of Homeland Security] policy to really work with the programs of DHS to make sure there’s not discrimination, and secondly to provide outreach to faith-based community organizations.”
Cook’s deputy, Greg DiNapoli, joined him Sept. 25 in touring the Secure Community Network facility. Representatives from the DHS bomb prevention squad and members of the New York Police Department were on hand as well to meet with the SCN advisory board, which is comprised of representatives from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Anti-Defamation League, United Jewish Communities, the New York Board of Rabbis and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.
The Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle received the maximum grant of $100,000 for this year, but had applied with the purpose of helping other groups in Seattle, including the Seattle Hebrew Academy and the Seattle Community School, to install security cameras and doors that can withstand heavy impact.
Many of the grants were awarded to organizations in the New York area. Another large concentration was in Maryland, where $900,000 will go to 19 Jewish organizations, including individual congregations and institutions such as the Jewish Museum of Maryland and the Maimonides Academy of Baltimore.
The $24 million in total grants announced by the Department of Homeland Security last week vary in amounts, with $100,000 the maximum. The funds are used to provide everything from roadblocks to security cameras to blast-proof doors and windows at locations that could be terrorist targets.
The grants were announced a few days after representatives of the Department of Homeland Security’s Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives toured the Jewish community's national security alert organization in Manhattan.
Center director John Kim Cook said: "Our objective is to get right in the middle of [Department of Homeland Security] policy to really work with the programs of DHS to make sure there’s not discrimination, and secondly to provide outreach to faith-based community organizations.”
Cook’s deputy, Greg DiNapoli, joined him Sept. 25 in touring the Secure Community Network facility. Representatives from the DHS bomb prevention squad and members of the New York Police Department were on hand as well to meet with the SCN advisory board, which is comprised of representatives from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Anti-Defamation League, United Jewish Communities, the New York Board of Rabbis and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.
The Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle received the maximum grant of $100,000 for this year, but had applied with the purpose of helping other groups in Seattle, including the Seattle Hebrew Academy and the Seattle Community School, to install security cameras and doors that can withstand heavy impact.
Many of the grants were awarded to organizations in the New York area. Another large concentration was in Maryland, where $900,000 will go to 19 Jewish organizations, including individual congregations and institutions such as the Jewish Museum of Maryland and the Maimonides Academy of Baltimore.
Monday, October 1, 2007
Mahmoud Knows Jews, By Patrick Grimm
September 27, 2007
Mahmoud Knows Jews
zionistwatch @ 9:42 am
By Patrick Grimm
If you are still dumb enough to get your news from the mainstream corporatist Jewish-as-ritual- murder-media, then you are really asking to have your brain pickled and what’s left of your intellect mugged, aren’t you? Never in my life have I seen a more one-sided presentation of a foreign leader’s visit to the United States. Then, as usual, on all the 24-7 news channels, CNN (Cabbala News Network) and FNC (Fox Neo-Con Channel) did their dutiful worst to portray this man, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a Hitler reincarnation, come back to avenge the Jews who have now bled Germany dry and destroyed her equilibrium and pride as a nation.
First, the Iranian President was treated like a sub-human by the head of Columbia University, Lee Bollinger, before he even got to approach the podium. Bollinger then ambled onto CNN dressed like a cheap lawyer running a practice from the back of a store. He was a mess and in need of a good haircut and for someone to teach him the basics in tying a half Windsor knot in a necktie. The fact that he went on television like this was a disgrace to his title. I don’t generally comment on how a person looks, but what a slob this Jew-worshipping aide to world Zionism is. I don’t know if he had been throwing back the high-balls or what before he stumbled in front of a camera, but perhaps somebody should have cleaned him up a little bit first. Columbia is a disgrace in so many ways, and Bollinger only further lowers the ante.
I watched with rapt interest as President Ahmadinejad spoke at the United Nations, and other than the occasional naïve platitude or utopian sentiment, I thought his speech was excellent. What bothers our Jewish arbiters, usurpers and anti-loyalists so much is not his supposed “anti-American rhetoric.” In fact, he had compliments for the American people and saved his critiques for our disgraced President and his failed policies in the Middle East. Thankfully, most of our citizens probably would second these sentiments if they came from any other source.
Why do the Jews at the Cabbala News Network and the Fox Neo-Con Channel need to dehumanize this man so much, even though he certainly came off better than “I’m a Jew-wannabe” Lee Bollinger, a man hooked on the Jew multi-culti, hate whitey, love your local Jewry reel-to-reel? The reason Iran’s President must be turned into a non-person in the same way Jews have turned Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, Ezra Pound and many other great heroes into media “nothings” is simple. They name the Jew, they name the “Controversy of Zion” as Douglas Reed calls it, and they refuse to go along with Jewish power. And not to confuse the issue, it is most Jews who are part of the problem, and the ones who oppose the ancient anti-Gentile, anti-humanity, anti-progress stratagems of their conspiring brethren are few, their numbers negligible, their impact nil. That needed to be cleared up pronto. I feel better now.
Ahmadinejad’s speech sounded in spots like those old “family values” stumps, yet without the language of opportunism and the triangulation that takes place on both sides and with more thoughtfulness than is usually present in politics. He stated:
Dear friends and colleagues, as you are all aware, mankind is currently facing important, numerous and diverse challenges and I will refer to some of them.
One, organized attempts to destroy the institution of family and to weaken the status of women. Family is the most sacred and valuable human institution that serves as the center of the purest mutual love and affection amongst mothers, fathers and children, and as a safe environment for the nurturing of human generations and a fertile ground for the blossoming of talents and compassion.
This institution has always been respected by all peoples, religions and cultures. Today, we are witnessing an organized invasion by the enemies of humanity and plunderers to destroy this noble institution that is targeted by promoting lewdness, violence and by breaking the boundaries of chastity and decency.
The precious existence of women, as the manifestation of divine beauty and as the peak of kindness, affection and purity has been the target of heavy exploitation in recent decades by the holders of power and the owners of media and wealth.
In some societies, this beloved human has been reduced to a mere instrument of publicity and all the boundaries and protective shields of chastity, purity and beauty have been trampled. This is a colossal betrayal of human society, of succeeding generations and an irreparable blow to the pillar of social coherence, the family. [1]
Can anyone say “JEWISH HOLLYWOOD” and “JEWISH MEDIA”? What else could the Iranian leader have been referring to when he says women have been “the target of heavy exploitation in recent decades by the holders of power and the owners of media and wealth”? It sounds like he is pointing the finger at Sumner Redstone and Rupert Murdoch in this passage.
But read on for the most honest and courageous words of his speech. “The era of darkness will end. Prisoners will return home. The occupied lands will be freed. Palestine and Iraq will be liberated from the domination of the occupiers. And the people of America and Europe will be free of the pressures exerted by the Zionists.” For this truth, these moderately-phrased lines, the Zionist media Jews, the neo-conservative intellectual dilettantes are rattling their sabers once more. “Ahmadinejad is the new Hitler! Oy freaking vey! It’s 1933 all over again!” Irving’s little boy, Willy Kristol will cry and Norman Podhoretz, a man who has no love for the country he lives in, guarantees us all “Bush will attack Iran before he leaves office!” He would know, wouldn’t he?
Yes, Mr. Ahmadinejad is right, and is the only world leader who seems to have nothing to lose in calling the Zionist Jewish enemy onto the carpet. “The people of America and Europe will be free of the pressures exerted by the Zionists.” This is pressure which strangles, cutting off the windpipe, even sometimes ripping out the trachea if need be. We (anti-Zionists) know it. Mahmoud knows it. The American people are learning it. The Europeans are yawning at the tired replayed reality of it. The Israelis are rubbing their hands over it and oiling up the agitprop, but keeping the gas masks on hand anyhow (New Holocaust is always imminent, you see).
But Holocaust fairy-taling and Jewish media alchemy are never in short supply. The “abracadabra” of “Hitler”, “1933”, “a new Final Solution” and every other black art magic phraseology they can exploit will be used by the Jewids. Their wizardry and pageantry and theatrics know no bounds and are never tempered by a flicker of conscience, propriety, self-consciousness or shame. “Give ‘em the old razzle dazzle!” the Jews who have stolen our media cry. “Stun and stagger ‘em!” And the ‘razzle dazzle’ always consists of blurring the issue, incorporating demonology into newscasts and commentary on an “unbiased” panel, which usually is made up of three Zionist Jews and then one Gentile nodding his head in agreement for fear of being the lone “anti-Semite” who becomes the victim of a fast-talking Jew verbal pile-on.
Cut through the fog, the smoke and mirrors, the controversy, both about Zion and Iran’s President and narrow this down to the crux, the nub of the issue. Why do they hate him? A simple three word answer will suffice. “Mahmoud knows Jews.” Why do they want to silence him? “Mahmoud knows Jews.” Why do the neo-cons want to bomb his country into rubble and kill his people? “Mahmoud knows Jews.” Why is Iran not allowed to have nukes in the first place? “Mahmoud knows Jews.”
So say what you want about this controversial leader, but he knows his subject matter well. That is why he is only portrayed as a caricature, a homicidal stereotype of what the “new anti-Semitism” looks like by the kvetchers carping over seltzer and bagels in the Cabbala Newsers or the Fox Neo-Conners board rooms. Yes, the Jews have poisoned the well, so-to-speak, once again, only this time it’s the media wellspring rather than the drinking supply of the Palestinian people in Gaza. What the Jews can’t poison is the groundswell of anger, fury and discontentment, all pointed in their direction like a weapon ready for firing, or to put it in Jewspeak, ready to ejaculate.
Yes, “Mahmoud knows Jews” and so do we. In fact, we know them so well that their bitching and whining is old hat, but dangerously, new fodder for war, food for the Jewish death god, for murder and for a “clash of civilizations” that they must dream about late nights at the American Enterprise Institute, spinning the globe and deciding who must die next for their ambitions. Of course, they’ve never seen the inside of a Sherman tank, only a thinking one and you can be sure their kids are not going to be dismembered for Israel. Ours will and Iran’s will, if neo-con-Jew- willing, we go to war. To prevent this we must insure that all of America’s people come to know Jews with as much familiarity and distaste as our anti-Zionists and Iran’s outspoken leader do.
Mahmoud Knows Jews
zionistwatch @ 9:42 am
By Patrick Grimm
If you are still dumb enough to get your news from the mainstream corporatist Jewish-as-ritual- murder-media, then you are really asking to have your brain pickled and what’s left of your intellect mugged, aren’t you? Never in my life have I seen a more one-sided presentation of a foreign leader’s visit to the United States. Then, as usual, on all the 24-7 news channels, CNN (Cabbala News Network) and FNC (Fox Neo-Con Channel) did their dutiful worst to portray this man, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a Hitler reincarnation, come back to avenge the Jews who have now bled Germany dry and destroyed her equilibrium and pride as a nation.
First, the Iranian President was treated like a sub-human by the head of Columbia University, Lee Bollinger, before he even got to approach the podium. Bollinger then ambled onto CNN dressed like a cheap lawyer running a practice from the back of a store. He was a mess and in need of a good haircut and for someone to teach him the basics in tying a half Windsor knot in a necktie. The fact that he went on television like this was a disgrace to his title. I don’t generally comment on how a person looks, but what a slob this Jew-worshipping aide to world Zionism is. I don’t know if he had been throwing back the high-balls or what before he stumbled in front of a camera, but perhaps somebody should have cleaned him up a little bit first. Columbia is a disgrace in so many ways, and Bollinger only further lowers the ante.
I watched with rapt interest as President Ahmadinejad spoke at the United Nations, and other than the occasional naïve platitude or utopian sentiment, I thought his speech was excellent. What bothers our Jewish arbiters, usurpers and anti-loyalists so much is not his supposed “anti-American rhetoric.” In fact, he had compliments for the American people and saved his critiques for our disgraced President and his failed policies in the Middle East. Thankfully, most of our citizens probably would second these sentiments if they came from any other source.
Why do the Jews at the Cabbala News Network and the Fox Neo-Con Channel need to dehumanize this man so much, even though he certainly came off better than “I’m a Jew-wannabe” Lee Bollinger, a man hooked on the Jew multi-culti, hate whitey, love your local Jewry reel-to-reel? The reason Iran’s President must be turned into a non-person in the same way Jews have turned Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, Ezra Pound and many other great heroes into media “nothings” is simple. They name the Jew, they name the “Controversy of Zion” as Douglas Reed calls it, and they refuse to go along with Jewish power. And not to confuse the issue, it is most Jews who are part of the problem, and the ones who oppose the ancient anti-Gentile, anti-humanity, anti-progress stratagems of their conspiring brethren are few, their numbers negligible, their impact nil. That needed to be cleared up pronto. I feel better now.
Ahmadinejad’s speech sounded in spots like those old “family values” stumps, yet without the language of opportunism and the triangulation that takes place on both sides and with more thoughtfulness than is usually present in politics. He stated:
Dear friends and colleagues, as you are all aware, mankind is currently facing important, numerous and diverse challenges and I will refer to some of them.
One, organized attempts to destroy the institution of family and to weaken the status of women. Family is the most sacred and valuable human institution that serves as the center of the purest mutual love and affection amongst mothers, fathers and children, and as a safe environment for the nurturing of human generations and a fertile ground for the blossoming of talents and compassion.
This institution has always been respected by all peoples, religions and cultures. Today, we are witnessing an organized invasion by the enemies of humanity and plunderers to destroy this noble institution that is targeted by promoting lewdness, violence and by breaking the boundaries of chastity and decency.
The precious existence of women, as the manifestation of divine beauty and as the peak of kindness, affection and purity has been the target of heavy exploitation in recent decades by the holders of power and the owners of media and wealth.
In some societies, this beloved human has been reduced to a mere instrument of publicity and all the boundaries and protective shields of chastity, purity and beauty have been trampled. This is a colossal betrayal of human society, of succeeding generations and an irreparable blow to the pillar of social coherence, the family. [1]
Can anyone say “JEWISH HOLLYWOOD” and “JEWISH MEDIA”? What else could the Iranian leader have been referring to when he says women have been “the target of heavy exploitation in recent decades by the holders of power and the owners of media and wealth”? It sounds like he is pointing the finger at Sumner Redstone and Rupert Murdoch in this passage.
But read on for the most honest and courageous words of his speech. “The era of darkness will end. Prisoners will return home. The occupied lands will be freed. Palestine and Iraq will be liberated from the domination of the occupiers. And the people of America and Europe will be free of the pressures exerted by the Zionists.” For this truth, these moderately-phrased lines, the Zionist media Jews, the neo-conservative intellectual dilettantes are rattling their sabers once more. “Ahmadinejad is the new Hitler! Oy freaking vey! It’s 1933 all over again!” Irving’s little boy, Willy Kristol will cry and Norman Podhoretz, a man who has no love for the country he lives in, guarantees us all “Bush will attack Iran before he leaves office!” He would know, wouldn’t he?
Yes, Mr. Ahmadinejad is right, and is the only world leader who seems to have nothing to lose in calling the Zionist Jewish enemy onto the carpet. “The people of America and Europe will be free of the pressures exerted by the Zionists.” This is pressure which strangles, cutting off the windpipe, even sometimes ripping out the trachea if need be. We (anti-Zionists) know it. Mahmoud knows it. The American people are learning it. The Europeans are yawning at the tired replayed reality of it. The Israelis are rubbing their hands over it and oiling up the agitprop, but keeping the gas masks on hand anyhow (New Holocaust is always imminent, you see).
But Holocaust fairy-taling and Jewish media alchemy are never in short supply. The “abracadabra” of “Hitler”, “1933”, “a new Final Solution” and every other black art magic phraseology they can exploit will be used by the Jewids. Their wizardry and pageantry and theatrics know no bounds and are never tempered by a flicker of conscience, propriety, self-consciousness or shame. “Give ‘em the old razzle dazzle!” the Jews who have stolen our media cry. “Stun and stagger ‘em!” And the ‘razzle dazzle’ always consists of blurring the issue, incorporating demonology into newscasts and commentary on an “unbiased” panel, which usually is made up of three Zionist Jews and then one Gentile nodding his head in agreement for fear of being the lone “anti-Semite” who becomes the victim of a fast-talking Jew verbal pile-on.
Cut through the fog, the smoke and mirrors, the controversy, both about Zion and Iran’s President and narrow this down to the crux, the nub of the issue. Why do they hate him? A simple three word answer will suffice. “Mahmoud knows Jews.” Why do they want to silence him? “Mahmoud knows Jews.” Why do the neo-cons want to bomb his country into rubble and kill his people? “Mahmoud knows Jews.” Why is Iran not allowed to have nukes in the first place? “Mahmoud knows Jews.”
So say what you want about this controversial leader, but he knows his subject matter well. That is why he is only portrayed as a caricature, a homicidal stereotype of what the “new anti-Semitism” looks like by the kvetchers carping over seltzer and bagels in the Cabbala Newsers or the Fox Neo-Conners board rooms. Yes, the Jews have poisoned the well, so-to-speak, once again, only this time it’s the media wellspring rather than the drinking supply of the Palestinian people in Gaza. What the Jews can’t poison is the groundswell of anger, fury and discontentment, all pointed in their direction like a weapon ready for firing, or to put it in Jewspeak, ready to ejaculate.
Yes, “Mahmoud knows Jews” and so do we. In fact, we know them so well that their bitching and whining is old hat, but dangerously, new fodder for war, food for the Jewish death god, for murder and for a “clash of civilizations” that they must dream about late nights at the American Enterprise Institute, spinning the globe and deciding who must die next for their ambitions. Of course, they’ve never seen the inside of a Sherman tank, only a thinking one and you can be sure their kids are not going to be dismembered for Israel. Ours will and Iran’s will, if neo-con-Jew- willing, we go to war. To prevent this we must insure that all of America’s people come to know Jews with as much familiarity and distaste as our anti-Zionists and Iran’s outspoken leader do.
United States = foreign corp.
The united states Of America is a corporation owned by foreign interests
Below are two articles covering the fact that, since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.
In 1871 the Congress changed the name of the original Constitution by changing ONE WORD -- and that was very significant as you will read.
Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any "legal" document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this.
I'm told this corporation, established in 1871, will be cancelled by NESARA and NESARA will also restore the ORIGINAL Constitution which assists in restoring our Constitutional Rights and the Bill of Rights and our rights as described in the Declaration of Independence.
1871, February 21:
Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871*
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).
The act -- passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War -- was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.
Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.
The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced -- in effect vandalized and sabotage -- when the title was capitalized and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title.
* Info from yet unpublished book, "Pentimento: Freedom Revisited." As you will see when reading, just as much of my knowledge of the Trading with the Enemy Act came from Gene Schroder, et al. this, too, came from elsewhere -- from Lisa Guilian of Babel Magazine, whom I first "met" by way of an article by Patrick Bellringer. So, we cooperate as we study and learn the truth. C. E.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does not!
Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly "minor" alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.
What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution.
Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a "privilege" that requires citizens to be licensed.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.
[Information courtesy of Lisa Guliani, www.babelmagazine.com. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.]
The UNITED STATES Isn't a Country - It's a Corporation!
In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain's banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what the common herd believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed the common herd all rights of sui juris. [sovereignty]
Congress, with no authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land. WHY and HOW did they do so? First, Lisa Guliani of Babel Magazine, reminds us that the Civil War was, in fact, "little more than a calculated front
with fancy footwork by backroom players." Then she adds:
"It was also a strategic maneuver by British and European interests (international bankers) intent on gaining a stranglehold on the coffers of America. And, because Congress knew our country was in dire financial straits, certain members of Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie). . . . . There you have the WHY, why members of Congress permitted the international bankers to gain further control of America. . . . .
"Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word 'for' to 'of' in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers read: 'The Constitution for the united states of America.' [note that neither the words 'united' nor 'states' began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA' is a corporate constitution, which is absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."
To fully understand how our rights of sovereignty were ended, you must know the full meaning of sovereign:
SOVEREIGN
"Chief or highest, supreme power, superior in position to all others; independent of and unlimited by others; possessing or entitled to; original and independent authority or jurisdiction."
--Webster--
In short, our government, which was created by and for us as sovereigns -- free citizens deemed to have the highest authority in the land -- was stolen from us, along with our rights. Keep in mind that, according to the original Constitution, only We the People are sovereign. Government is not
sovereign. The Declaration of Independence says, "government is subject to the consent of the governed." That's us -- the sovereigns. When did you last feet like a sovereign? As Lisa Guliani explained:
"It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that the U.S. Government has NOT been subject to the consent of the governed since long before you or I were born. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia. In fact, it has invaded every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction beyond the District of Columbia. You just think it does.
"You see, you are 'presumed' to know the law, which is very weird since We the People are taught NOTHING about the law in school. We memorize obscure facts and phrases here and there, like the Preamble, which says, 'We the People. establish this Constitution for the United States of America.' But our teachers only gloss over the Bill of Rights. Our schools (controlled by the corporate government) don't delve into the Constitution at depth. After all, the corporation was established to indoctrinate and 'dumb-down' the masses, not to teach anything of value or importance.
"Certainly, no one mentioned that America was sold-out to foreign interests, that we were beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress, or that we were in debt to the international bankers. Yet, for generations, Americans have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay a massive debt that they did not incur. There's an endless stream of things the People aren't told. And, now that you are being told, how do you feel about being made the recipient of a debt without your knowledge or consent?
"After passage of the Act of 1871, Congress set a series of subtle and overt deceptions into motion, deceptions in the form of decisions that were meant to sell us down the river.
"Over time, the Republic took it on the chin until it was knocked down and counted out by a technical KO [knock out]. With the surrender of the people's gold in 1933, the 'common herd' was handed over to illegitimate law. (I'll bet you weren't taught THAT in school.)
"Our corporate form of governance is based on Roman Civil Law and Admiralty, or Maritime, Law, which is also known as the 'Divine Right of Kings' and the 'Law of the Seas' -- another fact of American history not taught in our schools. Actually, Roman Civil Law was fully established in the colonies before our nation began, and then became managed by private international law. In other words, the government -- the government created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 -- operates solely under Private International Law, not Common Law, which was the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.
"This fact has impacted all Americans in concrete ways. For instance, although Private International Law is technically only applicable within the District of Columbia, and NOT in the other states of the Union, the arms of the Corporation of the UNITED STATES are called 'departments' --i.e., the Justice Department, the Treasury Department. And those departments affect everyone, no matter where (in what state) they live. Guess what? Each department belongs to the corporation -- to the UNITED STATES.
"Refer to any UNITED STATES CODE (USC). Note the capitalization; this is evidence of a corporation, not a Republic. For example, In Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), it is unequivocally stated that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Translation: the corporation is NOT a separate and distinct entity; it is not disconnected from the government; it IS the government -- your government. This is extremely important! I refer to it as the 'corporate EMPIRE of the UNITED STATES,' which operates under Roman Civil Law outside the original Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a
corporation? You say you'll ask your Congressperson about this? HA!!
"Congress is fully aware of this deception. So it's time that you, too, become aware of the deception. What this great deception means is that the members of Congress do NOT work for us, for you and me. They work for the Corporation, for the UNITED STATES. No wonder we can't get them to do anything on our behalf, or meet or demands, or answer our questions.
"Technically, legally, or any other way you want to look at the matter, the corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY State of the Union (the Republic) beyond the District of Columbia. Let that tidbit sink in, then ask yourself, could this deception have occurred without full knowledge and complicity of the Congress? Do you think it happened by accident? If you do, you're deceiving yourself.
"There are no accidents, no coincidences. Face the facts and confront the truth. Remember, you are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law or, for that matter, your history. Why? Because no concerted effort was ever made to teach or otherwise inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of all facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to 'give' you.
"Remember also that 'Ignorance of the law is no excuse.' It's your responsibility and obligation to learn the law and know how it applies to you. No wonder the corporation counted on the fact that most people are too indifferent, unconcerned, distracted, or lazy to learn what they need to know to survive within the system. We have been conditioned to let the government do our thinking for us. Now's the time to turn that around if we intend to help save our Republic and ourselves -- before it's too late.
"As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES owns you from birth to death. It also holds ownership of all your assets, of your property, even of your children. Think long and hard about all the bills taxes, fines, and licenses you have paid for or purchased. Yes, they had you by the pockets. If you don't believe it, read the 14th Amendment. See how 'free' you really are. Ignorance of the facts led to your silence. Silence is construed as consent; consent to be beneficiaries of a debt you did not incur. As a Sovereign People we have been deceived for hundreds of years; we think we are free, but in truth we are servants of the corporation.
"Congress committed treason against the People in 1871. Honest men could have corrected the fraud and treason. But apparently there weren't enough honest men to counteract the lust for money and power. We lost more freedom than we will ever know, thanks to corporate infiltration of our so-called 'government.'
"Do you think that any soldier who died in any of our many wars would have fought if he or she had known the truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his/her life for a corporation? How long will we remain silent? How long will we perpetuate the MYTH that we are free? When will we stand together as One Sovereign People? When will we take back what has been as stolen from the us?
"If the People of America had known to what extent their trust was betrayed, how long would it have taken for a real revolution to occur? What we now need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We need to change our thinking, then we can change our world. Our children deserve their rightful legacy -- the liberty our ancestors fought to preserve, the legacy of a Sovereign and Fully Free People." [Posted 8/27/02, www.babalmagazine.com/]
From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:
"Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve - in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend THE FEDERAL United States CORPORATION [emphasis added] all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.
Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another. ."
Below are two articles covering the fact that, since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.
In 1871 the Congress changed the name of the original Constitution by changing ONE WORD -- and that was very significant as you will read.
Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any "legal" document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this.
I'm told this corporation, established in 1871, will be cancelled by NESARA and NESARA will also restore the ORIGINAL Constitution which assists in restoring our Constitutional Rights and the Bill of Rights and our rights as described in the Declaration of Independence.
1871, February 21:
Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871*
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).
The act -- passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War -- was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.
Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.
The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced -- in effect vandalized and sabotage -- when the title was capitalized and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title.
* Info from yet unpublished book, "Pentimento: Freedom Revisited." As you will see when reading, just as much of my knowledge of the Trading with the Enemy Act came from Gene Schroder, et al. this, too, came from elsewhere -- from Lisa Guilian of Babel Magazine, whom I first "met" by way of an article by Patrick Bellringer. So, we cooperate as we study and learn the truth. C. E.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does not!
Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly "minor" alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.
What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution.
Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a "privilege" that requires citizens to be licensed.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.
[Information courtesy of Lisa Guliani, www.babelmagazine.com. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.]
The UNITED STATES Isn't a Country - It's a Corporation!
In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain's banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what the common herd believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed the common herd all rights of sui juris. [sovereignty]
Congress, with no authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land. WHY and HOW did they do so? First, Lisa Guliani of Babel Magazine, reminds us that the Civil War was, in fact, "little more than a calculated front
with fancy footwork by backroom players." Then she adds:
"It was also a strategic maneuver by British and European interests (international bankers) intent on gaining a stranglehold on the coffers of America. And, because Congress knew our country was in dire financial straits, certain members of Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie). . . . . There you have the WHY, why members of Congress permitted the international bankers to gain further control of America. . . . .
"Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word 'for' to 'of' in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers read: 'The Constitution for the united states of America.' [note that neither the words 'united' nor 'states' began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA' is a corporate constitution, which is absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."
To fully understand how our rights of sovereignty were ended, you must know the full meaning of sovereign:
SOVEREIGN
"Chief or highest, supreme power, superior in position to all others; independent of and unlimited by others; possessing or entitled to; original and independent authority or jurisdiction."
--Webster--
In short, our government, which was created by and for us as sovereigns -- free citizens deemed to have the highest authority in the land -- was stolen from us, along with our rights. Keep in mind that, according to the original Constitution, only We the People are sovereign. Government is not
sovereign. The Declaration of Independence says, "government is subject to the consent of the governed." That's us -- the sovereigns. When did you last feet like a sovereign? As Lisa Guliani explained:
"It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that the U.S. Government has NOT been subject to the consent of the governed since long before you or I were born. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia. In fact, it has invaded every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction beyond the District of Columbia. You just think it does.
"You see, you are 'presumed' to know the law, which is very weird since We the People are taught NOTHING about the law in school. We memorize obscure facts and phrases here and there, like the Preamble, which says, 'We the People. establish this Constitution for the United States of America.' But our teachers only gloss over the Bill of Rights. Our schools (controlled by the corporate government) don't delve into the Constitution at depth. After all, the corporation was established to indoctrinate and 'dumb-down' the masses, not to teach anything of value or importance.
"Certainly, no one mentioned that America was sold-out to foreign interests, that we were beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress, or that we were in debt to the international bankers. Yet, for generations, Americans have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay a massive debt that they did not incur. There's an endless stream of things the People aren't told. And, now that you are being told, how do you feel about being made the recipient of a debt without your knowledge or consent?
"After passage of the Act of 1871, Congress set a series of subtle and overt deceptions into motion, deceptions in the form of decisions that were meant to sell us down the river.
"Over time, the Republic took it on the chin until it was knocked down and counted out by a technical KO [knock out]. With the surrender of the people's gold in 1933, the 'common herd' was handed over to illegitimate law. (I'll bet you weren't taught THAT in school.)
"Our corporate form of governance is based on Roman Civil Law and Admiralty, or Maritime, Law, which is also known as the 'Divine Right of Kings' and the 'Law of the Seas' -- another fact of American history not taught in our schools. Actually, Roman Civil Law was fully established in the colonies before our nation began, and then became managed by private international law. In other words, the government -- the government created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 -- operates solely under Private International Law, not Common Law, which was the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.
"This fact has impacted all Americans in concrete ways. For instance, although Private International Law is technically only applicable within the District of Columbia, and NOT in the other states of the Union, the arms of the Corporation of the UNITED STATES are called 'departments' --i.e., the Justice Department, the Treasury Department. And those departments affect everyone, no matter where (in what state) they live. Guess what? Each department belongs to the corporation -- to the UNITED STATES.
"Refer to any UNITED STATES CODE (USC). Note the capitalization; this is evidence of a corporation, not a Republic. For example, In Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), it is unequivocally stated that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Translation: the corporation is NOT a separate and distinct entity; it is not disconnected from the government; it IS the government -- your government. This is extremely important! I refer to it as the 'corporate EMPIRE of the UNITED STATES,' which operates under Roman Civil Law outside the original Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a
corporation? You say you'll ask your Congressperson about this? HA!!
"Congress is fully aware of this deception. So it's time that you, too, become aware of the deception. What this great deception means is that the members of Congress do NOT work for us, for you and me. They work for the Corporation, for the UNITED STATES. No wonder we can't get them to do anything on our behalf, or meet or demands, or answer our questions.
"Technically, legally, or any other way you want to look at the matter, the corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY State of the Union (the Republic) beyond the District of Columbia. Let that tidbit sink in, then ask yourself, could this deception have occurred without full knowledge and complicity of the Congress? Do you think it happened by accident? If you do, you're deceiving yourself.
"There are no accidents, no coincidences. Face the facts and confront the truth. Remember, you are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law or, for that matter, your history. Why? Because no concerted effort was ever made to teach or otherwise inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of all facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to 'give' you.
"Remember also that 'Ignorance of the law is no excuse.' It's your responsibility and obligation to learn the law and know how it applies to you. No wonder the corporation counted on the fact that most people are too indifferent, unconcerned, distracted, or lazy to learn what they need to know to survive within the system. We have been conditioned to let the government do our thinking for us. Now's the time to turn that around if we intend to help save our Republic and ourselves -- before it's too late.
"As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES owns you from birth to death. It also holds ownership of all your assets, of your property, even of your children. Think long and hard about all the bills taxes, fines, and licenses you have paid for or purchased. Yes, they had you by the pockets. If you don't believe it, read the 14th Amendment. See how 'free' you really are. Ignorance of the facts led to your silence. Silence is construed as consent; consent to be beneficiaries of a debt you did not incur. As a Sovereign People we have been deceived for hundreds of years; we think we are free, but in truth we are servants of the corporation.
"Congress committed treason against the People in 1871. Honest men could have corrected the fraud and treason. But apparently there weren't enough honest men to counteract the lust for money and power. We lost more freedom than we will ever know, thanks to corporate infiltration of our so-called 'government.'
"Do you think that any soldier who died in any of our many wars would have fought if he or she had known the truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his/her life for a corporation? How long will we remain silent? How long will we perpetuate the MYTH that we are free? When will we stand together as One Sovereign People? When will we take back what has been as stolen from the us?
"If the People of America had known to what extent their trust was betrayed, how long would it have taken for a real revolution to occur? What we now need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We need to change our thinking, then we can change our world. Our children deserve their rightful legacy -- the liberty our ancestors fought to preserve, the legacy of a Sovereign and Fully Free People." [Posted 8/27/02, www.babalmagazine.com/]
From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:
"Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve - in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend THE FEDERAL United States CORPORATION [emphasis added] all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.
Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another. ."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)